Chain · United States · data through August 2026

W White House Black Market logo White House Black Market

Iceflower tracks 344 White House Black Market stores across 41 US states and DC. It ranks #55 of 14,367 tracked US clothing stores chains by card spend. Its share of tracked category spend moved -12.1% over the last year.

Rankings come from real card and bank transactions across a panel of 130M+ US and EU consumers. We publish relative growth and rankings, never revenue figures. About the data

Tracked stores
344
States
41
Category
Clothing Store
Category rank
#55

Growth

White House Black Market against its category

The biggest tracked US clothing stores chains by card spend, with year-over-year growth of category share. Share means a chain's slice of tracked category spend. It can decline while the chain's own sales grow. The chart tracks White House Black Market's share of the category quarter by quarter, indexed to 2024 Q3 = 100.

# Chain YoY share
1 R Ross Dress for Less logo Ross Dress for Less +12.0%
2 B Burlington logo Burlington +5.0%
3 O Old Navy logo Old Navy -1.6%
4 A American Eagle logo American Eagle -2.2%
5 V Victoria's Secret logo Victoria's Secret +6.2%
6 L lululemon logo lululemon +4.5%
7 H H&M logo H&M -7.0%
8 M Men's Wearhouse logo Men's Wearhouse +0.6%
9 Z Zara logo Zara +1.4%
10 B Bealls logo Bealls +1.7%
55 W White House Black Market logo White House Black Market -12.1%

Share of tracked category spend, indexed

100 106.6 2024 Q3 2026 Q2

Store footprint

Store map

344 tracked White House Black Market locations across 41 US states and DC.

Customer overlap

Who shops at White House Black Market

Tracked chains White House Black Market customers also buy from more than a similarly active shopper would, indexed to the strongest overlap (100). From real card transactions.

More trends

Ready to see your market clearly?

Create an account, pick a plan, and explore your merchants, competitors and customers the way they actually behave.

Working in fashion, apparel and footwear? See consumer transaction data for fashion, apparel and footwear →